This page has tags:

1. 1 2020-03-12T22:19:42+00:00 Alicia Peaker fa9ce5cf6cff641fdb630497ef4559c09dbe1858 Meike Nixdorf Alicia Peaker 1 plain 2020-03-12T22:19:42+00:00 Alicia Peaker fa9ce5cf6cff641fdb630497ef4559c09dbe1858

This page is referenced by:

• 1 2020-03-12T22:19:41+00:00 Tombleson’s Panoramic Map of the Thames and Medway 1 plain 2285 2020-03-12T22:19:41+00:00

  
  
  William Tombleson (1795–c. 1846, British)
  Tombleson’s Panoramic Map of the Thames and Medway
  London: J. Reynolds, 1875
  
  This extended map of the Thames tracks its tributaries, islands, and course, but especially the record of thousands of years of human interaction with the river: settlements, bridges, locks and weirs, canals, ferry crossings, and railroads. Major docks in London are marked, as is the Thames Tunnel, and the entire river is measured out, upstream and down, with the distance from London Bridge.

   

  Post-war technologies, like satellites, have reformed cartography as a science. Our modern conception of a map is epitomized by Google Maps: a seamless composite of interactive images useful for their geographical precision.  Still, the utility of these new maps relies on the same processes-- the abstraction of space and the filtering of information-- which characterize the 19th century Tombleson map.
  
  The Tombleson map aspires to naturalism, if not accuracy. Space is distorted and collapsed to pack in geographic detail around the Thames river. The map elects to identify human-made features over natural ones, meticulously transcribing the names of towns, bridges, ferries, and railways. Yet its equally detailed portrayal of the terrain--etchings of hills, trees, farmland and islets-- affirms nature's importance to the history of human settlement around the river, whose course has dictated this society's growth. These visual elements are also designed for aesthetic pleasure. The river's serpentine shape resembles a raised vein, or a line traced by a lazy finger, while the map's birds-eye view gives the illusion of mastery, imagining the world as a sliver of land which dissipates as it rolls outward from the Thames' banks. 
  
  Human touch is present in both the production of the map and the built forms it depicts. Compare the map to Meike Nixdorf's Your Earth Transforms series, whose verisimilitude at first disguises the artist's manipulation of nature. Nixdorf collapses and re-imagines space, constructing dense, fictional mountain ranges from the images of real ones. Like the Tombleson map, there is a sense of diachrony in her pictures, whose chilly, prehistoric landscapes index glacial paths and the movement of tectonic plates. Yet unlike the map, a record of human activity at first appears absent in Nixdorf's geographies. Instead, human intervention reveals itself in the act of image-making, in which the artist has digitally fractured and re-assembled the land.